GMT vs. The French Clock: Why Structure Turned Me into an “A” Student
I recently had the privilege of immersing myself in a rigorous, sponsored professional training program with a prestigious institution in France. Stepping into that environment, even as an experienced professional, was a revelation.
While the curriculum was designed to sharpen my skills as an International Organization’s translator, the biggest lesson I took away wasn’t about language; it was about culture, structure, and the absolute sanctity of time.
The Struggle with “Ghana Man Time”
For those of us who strive for excellence, living in a context where “Ghana Man Time” (GMT) is the norm can be exhausting. I have always placed a premium on punctuality, clarity, and organization. To me, these are not just habits; they are a sign of respect. Yet, in our local context, we often treat time as a suggestion rather than a rule. If an event in Mampong is slated for 11:00 AM, we psychologically prepare for a 2:00 PM start.
This clash of values usually plays out in two ways for me:
- The Good: I once had a business meeting with a lawyer friend. We agreed on 9:00 AM. I was there at 8:55 AM. He walked in at 9:00 AM sharp, looked at me, and asked, “Martinien, have you lived abroad before?” He was shocked that I was on time. That mutual respect for time cemented our business relationship instantly.
- The Bad: I once went on a date where the other person showed up 30 minutes late. By the time they arrived, I was gone. It might sound harsh, but if you cannot respect my time, you likely won’t respect my person.
The French Difference
Fast forward to my recent experience with the French institution. For the first time, I experienced how pleasant a truly structured system feels.
The facilitators didn’t just teach; they operated with surgical precision. If a coffee break was scheduled for 10:00 AM, we stopped at 10:00 AM. There was no “Oh, let me just quickly finish this chapter, we will break at 10:45.” No. The respect for the schedule was absolute. The communication was proactive, clear, and devoid of ambiguity.
Here is the interesting part: Back home, in our chaotic academic structures, I never really saw myself as the typical “A” student. I am an “A” professional (I deliver on my goals) but the academic environment often felt stifling. However, in this French environment, where structure was King, I thrived. I became an “A” student effortlessly because the system removed the friction of disorder.
The Cost of Disorder
This is not about genes; it is about culture and policy. The lack of structure in Ghana isn’t just annoying; it is expensive. Economists have long estimated that African economies lose billions of dollars annually due to inefficiencies and poor time management. When a meeting starts two hours late, that is two hours of productivity (and GDP) vanished into thin air.
My Plea to Educators and Policymakers
We need to stop treating punctuality and organization as “Western” concepts. They are economic necessities.
I am calling on our educationists and policymakers to intentionally advocate for these attributes. We need a robust quality control system in our schools and workplaces that rewards structure and penalizes the “GMT” mentality. We are draining our energy dealing with people who have no regard for time, and it is costing us our future.
I returned from this training not just with a certificate, but with a renewed conviction: Talent is universal, but structure is the soil in which it blooms.
Let’s fix the soil.
Comments